According to @mcuban, selling the same Medicare Advantage or ACA plans through Amazon or Costco will not improve plan quality or value, calling them the same garbage and stressing that changing the sales channel does not change the underlying insurance carrier offering (source: @mcuban on X, Dec 4, 2025). For traders, this highlights execution risk in retail health insurance distribution narratives, indicating that channel partnerships alone may deliver limited product differentiation or consumer benefit if the carriers remain unchanged, as stated by the author (source: @mcuban on X, Dec 4, 2025). The post provides no direct cryptocurrency reference or linkage, implying no verified near-term crypto market impact based on the information shared (source: @mcuban on X, Dec 4, 2025).

According to @mcuban, channeling taxpayer-funded $1,000 per month into HSAs reframes the actuarial value of recipients and, for those earning below the federal standard deduction, non-qualified spending would only incur a 20% penalty, leaving roughly an additional $10,000 per year to use, source: @mcuban. According to @mcuban, directing $1,000 per month into HSAs would also encourage more Medicare Advantage-type structures, with carriers setting up zero-premium plans, adding incentives, and matching deductibles to the HSA inflow, source: @mcuban. According to @mcuban, he guarantees these designs would produce a lower payout value than the worst ACA plan, implying leaner claim costs relative to ACA benchmarks from the insurer perspective, source: @mcuban. According to @mcuban, recipients could earn interest on HSA balances until used, but plans would steer spending to in-network providers at inflated prices, which he characterizes as a razors-and-razor-blades marketing model, source: @mcuban.

According to Mark Cuban, unspecified players would absolutely love it because they crush it with Medicare Advantage, signaling his view that the Medicare Advantage line is highly profitable for those involved (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He did not specify which entity in the post, so the immediate takeaway is limited to sentiment around Medicare Advantage profitability rather than company-specific fundamentals (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). For trading, Cuban’s remark can act as a headline-driven sentiment cue to monitor U.S. managed-care names with significant Medicare Advantage exposure for short-term moves and volume spikes, while noting that the post provides no quantitative data (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). There is no mention of cryptocurrencies or digital assets in the post (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025).

According to Mark Cuban, U.S. taxpayers rarely pay doctors directly, with funding flowing to states via Medicaid, to hospitals and providers via traditional Medicare, to insurance carriers via Medicare Advantage and ACA plans, and indirectly through tax benefits for individuals and employers (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He says the system overpays because carriers are incentivized to scale, contract at inflated prices, invent fees, and delay or deny care, with PBMs contributing to the problem (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He proposes breaking up big carriers by vertical and requiring intercompany transfers at Medicare rates or best price until structural changes are made (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He calls to remove formularies from PBMs and to count extra cash drug purchases toward patient deductibles (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He urges nonprofit hospitals and providers to publish every general ledger entry and to stop 340B abuse (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He adds that caregivers benefit the least financially and argues doctors should be able to operate independent practices and receive the same Medicare rates as hospitals for the same work (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025). He challenges employers to disclose their insurance and PBM choices and to walk away from the biggest carriers and their PBMs (source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 29, 2025).

According to @mcuban, annual premium subsidies funneled into HSAs create a strong incentive for healthy consumers to pick the lowest-premium plans that maximize HSA deposits and keep the spread. Source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 20, 2025. He argues insurers will roll out zero-premium-style products similar to Medicare Advantage, enabling carriers to profit from enrollment shifts into these designs. Source: Mark Cuban on X, Nov 20, 2025. For traders, his thesis points to potential upside for managed care and HSA platforms if this policy path advances; key liquid exposures include UnitedHealth Group (UNH) and CVS Health (CVS) for Medicare Advantage scale, and HealthEquity (HQY) and Optum Bank under UnitedHealth for HSA assets. Source: UnitedHealth Group 2023 Form 10-K; CVS Health 2023 Form 10-K; HealthEquity FY2024 investor materials. Cross-asset context: policy headlines that lift healthcare heavyweights can move major equity indices, and research has documented episodes of elevated crypto–equity correlation that can transmit risk-on flows to Bitcoin. Source: IMF Global Financial Stability Note 2022; Mark Cuban on X, Nov 20, 2025.

According to @mcuban, journalist Wendell Potter highlights that UnitedHealth reported a $4.3 billion quarterly result and links the profitability to U.S. government-funded programs such as Medicare Advantage, drawing attention to taxpayer-backed margins. Source: @mcuban on X; Wendell Potter, Healthcare Uncovered on Substack. For traders, the post underscores that UNH earnings quality is highly sensitive to federal reimbursement policy, elevating headline risk around government rate-setting and oversight. Source: Wendell Potter, Healthcare Uncovered on Substack. Key catalysts to monitor include CMS Medicare Advantage rate notices, audit/enforcement activity, and any changes to payment models, which UnitedHealth discloses can materially affect revenue and margins. Source: UnitedHealth Group 2023 Form 10-K risk factors. Crypto angle: shifts in U.S. fiscal outlays and healthcare policy can influence liquidity, Treasury yields, and cross-asset risk appetite that have shown periodic correlation with BTC and ETH performance. Source: Federal Reserve Financial Stability Report (2023) on risk appetite; Kaiko research (2023) on BTC–equity correlation.